The Death of Office Politics (And What Replaced It)
dailyblog.scottdclary.com
Hi All,
Here’s my daily newsletter navigating the crossroads of business, growth, and life.
If you love this content (please share it), but also…
Start here > https://newsletter.scottdclary.com
Check out my Podcast, connect with me on YouTube / Twitter, and read my Weekly newsletter.
Sponsor: NordVPN
The numbers speak for themselves - NordVPN protects over 14 million users with more than 7,100 servers across 118 countries, saving countless hours of buffering and providing peace of mind. As an all-in-one security solution, NordVPN helps travelers, families, and tech enthusiasts encrypt their connections with one click, change virtual locations easily, and protect up to 10 devices simultaneously - all while offering lightning-fast speeds and award-winning Threat Protection Pro features.
Ready to stop worrying about your online privacy and access your favorite content from anywhere? Start your risk-free trial with NordVPN's 30-day money-back guarantee.
Plus, if you act now, get an exclusive listener offer of 4 extra months on the 2-year plan at nordvpn.com/success - the link is in the episode description.
Transform Your Online Experience with NordVPN
Mastering Remote Leadership in a Hybrid World
When GitLab's CEO Sid Sijbrandij started his company in 2011, people thought he was crazy. Not just because he was building yet another code repository platform, but because he decided to make GitLab a fully remote company from day one.
Back then, remote work was seen as a perk, not a strategy. But Sijbrandij saw something others missed. He recognized that the real limitation of traditional offices wasn't the physical space—it was the invisible web of politics, hierarchy, and inefficient communication patterns that developed within them.
The traditional office was built on presence, not performance. Think about it. How many times have you seen someone get promoted because they were "always there," putting in those long hours, playing the political game perfectly? Meanwhile, the quiet achiever who delivered consistently but left at 5 PM got overlooked.
This system worked well enough in a world where physical presence equated to productivity. But that world doesn't exist anymore. And what's fascinating is that the death of traditional office politics didn't create a vacuum—it created something far more interesting.
What replaced office politics isn't the absence of politics—it's the emergence of digital influence. The ability to communicate clearly, build trust through pixels, and lead without leaning on physical presence has become the new currency of organizational power.
But here's where it gets tricky. Most leaders are still playing by the old rulebook. They're trying to recreate the office environment online, scheduling endless Zoom meetings and monitoring "online status" as if it were the new "butts in seats" metric.
What they don't realize is that this approach isn't just ineffective—it's actively harmful. It's like trying to use a landline phone book to navigate Google Maps. The tool simply doesn't fit the task.
The rules have changed, and the leaders who understand this aren't just surviving in the new world of work—they're thriving in it. They're building organizations that move faster, communicate clearer, and achieve more than their office-bound counterparts ever could.
But to understand how they're doing it, we need to first understand the paradox at the heart of remote leadership. Because what looks like a disadvantage on the surface might just be your biggest opportunity for breakthrough performance.
The Remote Leadership Paradox
What Sijbrandij discovered in those early days of GitLab was counterintuitive. The less he tried to control his team's every move, the more they accomplished. The less he relied on synchronous communication, the clearer their communication became. The less he focused on where people worked, the more they got done.
This is the remote leadership paradox. The very things that make remote leadership feel difficult are exactly what make it powerful.
Think about traditional leadership for a moment. It's built on visibility. On walking the floor. On those "quick chats" that interrupt deep work. On being able to "read the room." We've been conditioned to believe that good leadership requires physical presence.
But GitLab grew from a tiny startup to a company valued at over $11 billion, all while being fully remote. They didn't succeed despite being remote—they succeeded because of it. They were forced to develop systems and practices that didn't rely on physical presence, and in doing so, they created something more scalable and more efficient than traditional office-based companies.
The key insight? Remote leadership isn't about recreating the office online. It's about rethinking how work gets done entirely.
When you can't rely on physical presence, you have to build systems that work based on outcomes, not activity. When you can't have quick hallway conversations, you're forced to document decisions and communicate more clearly. When you can't see what people are doing, you have to trust them—and in doing so, you often get more than you ever would have through monitoring.
This is where most leaders get it wrong. They see these constraints as problems to be solved rather than advantages to be leveraged. They try to compensate for the lack of physical presence by overcompensating with digital presence—more meetings, more check-ins, more status updates.
But the most successful remote leaders do the opposite. They embrace the constraints of remote work and use them to build stronger, more resilient organizations.
The New Rules of Digital Authority
One of GitLab's most controversial moves wasn't going remote—it was making their entire company handbook public. Over 2,000 pages of internal documentation, available for anyone to read. Their competitors thought they were giving away their playbook. But Sijbrandij understood something fundamental about digital authority.
In a remote world, your influence isn't built through presence—it's built through clarity.
When you can't rely on physical charisma or in-person relationships, something interesting happens. Your authority comes from how well you can articulate ideas, make decisions transparent, and create clarity in chaos.
Traditional authority relied on hierarchy. Digital authority relies on clarity.
Think about the best remote leaders you know. They're not the ones constantly demanding attention or scheduling endless check-ins. They're the ones who:
Write with unprecedented clarity
Make complex decisions simple
Create systems that scale without their presence
But here's what's fascinating about GitLab's approach. By making everything public, they forced themselves to be clear. There was nowhere to hide. No "I'll explain it in person" or "swing by my office." Every decision, every process, every piece of communication had to stand on its own.
The result? A level of organizational clarity that office-based companies can only dream of.
This brings us to the first rule of digital authority: Documentation beats conversation. Not because conversation isn't valuable, but because documented thoughts scale. They can be referenced, shared, and built upon without the original author present.
The second rule might surprise you: Silence is a feature, not a bug.
In a traditional office, silence often meant disengagement. In a remote environment, silence often means deep work is happening. The best remote leaders understand this. They don't fill the digital void with noise. They create space for focused work and use asynchronous communication by default.
But perhaps the most counterintuitive rule is this: The more distributed your team becomes, the more centralized your information needs to be.
GitLab proved this by centralizing everything in their public handbook. No tribal knowledge. No information silos. No "ask Bob in accounting, he knows how this works." Everything documented, everything accessible.
The Three Pillars of Remote Team Success
This is where the rubber meets the road. Because understanding these rules is one thing—implementing them is another entirely. Through years of trial and error, GitLab discovered that successful remote teams stand on three critical pillars.
The first pillar is what they call Asynchronous by Default. This isn't just about having fewer meetings. It's about restructuring work itself. When GitLab needed to make a major product decision, they didn't call a meeting. They created a written proposal, shared it with stakeholders, and gave people time to think deeply and respond thoughtfully.
The magic of asynchronous work isn't in the time saved—it's in the thought quality gained.
The second pillar is Documented Decisions. At GitLab, if it's not written down, it didn't happen. This might seem extreme, but it solves one of the biggest problems in remote teams: the "I thought we agreed on..." syndrome. When every decision is documented, alignment becomes automatic.
The third pillar, and perhaps the most crucial, is Intentional Communication. In a remote setting, you can't rely on body language or casual conversations to fill in the gaps. Your words—written or spoken—need to carry the full weight of your meaning.
This is why GitLab developed what they call "low-context communication." Every message, every document, every piece of communication should contain enough context to be understood on its own, without requiring additional explanation.
The fascinating thing about these pillars is that they don't just solve remote work problems—they solve work problems, period. Teams that master these principles find they work better even when they're in the same room.
The Technology Trap
When GitLab first started scaling, they faced a problem that nearly every remote team encounters. People started asking for more tools. More ways to stay connected. More ways to collaborate. More ways to "feel" like a team.
It's a natural instinct. When you can't see your team, the immediate response is to add more technology to bridge the gap. Another chat app. Another project management tool. Another virtual whiteboard solution.
But here's what Sijbrandij and his team discovered: More tools usually create more problems than they solve.
Think about it. Every new tool you add to your stack creates:
A new place where information lives
A new system people need to learn
A new set of notifications to manage
A new potential point of failure
The problem isn't a lack of tools—it's a lack of intention in how we use them.
GitLab made a radical decision. Instead of adding more tools, they stripped away everything that wasn't essential. They built their own platform that integrated everything they needed, and more importantly, they created clear guidelines about how and when to use each tool.
The key isn't having the right tools—it's having the right workflows.
This brings us to one of the most overlooked aspects of remote leadership: The best remote leaders aren't tool experts—they're communication architects. They design systems that make it clear:
Where different types of information should live
Which tools should be used for what purpose
When synchronous communication is actually necessary
Mastering the Meta-Office
This is where GitLab's approach gets really interesting. Instead of trying to recreate the office experience online, they created what I call a "meta-office"—a digital workspace that's actually more effective than a physical one.
In a traditional office, information flows through conversations, meetings, and the occasional email. In GitLab's meta-office, information flows through structured systems that make knowledge accessible and actionable.
The meta-office isn't about where people work—it's about how work flows.
Here's what makes it powerful: In a physical office, knowledge is often trapped in people's heads or buried in email threads. In a well-designed meta-office, knowledge is:
Documented by default
Easily discoverable
Always up to date
Available across time zones
But perhaps the most powerful aspect of the meta-office is how it scales. When GitLab grew from 100 to 1,000 employees, they didn't need to fundamentally change how they worked. The systems they built worked just as well at 1,000 people as they did at 100.
This is the secret to sustainable remote leadership: Build systems that scale with your team, not despite it.
The Future-Proof Remote Leader
What GitLab ultimately proved wasn't just that remote work could succeed—they proved it could excel. They showed that when you embrace the constraints of remote work instead of fighting them, you can build something more resilient and more scalable than traditional office-based companies.
The future of leadership isn't about managing presence—it's about enabling performance.
This is where the real opportunity lies. As more companies struggle with hybrid work and remote transitions, those who master these principles won't just survive—they'll thrive. They'll build organizations that:
Move faster because they're not bogged down by synchronous communication
Make better decisions because they're based on documented thinking, not quick conversations
Attract better talent because they're not limited by geography
Scale more efficiently because their systems are designed for growth
The truth is, what we're calling "remote leadership" today will just be called "leadership" tomorrow. The principles that make remote teams successful are the same principles that make any team successful—they're just more obvious when you're working remotely.
The leaders who understand this aren't just adapting to the future of work—they're creating it.
And here's the most exciting part: You don't need to be a tech company like GitLab to apply these principles. Whether you're running a marketing agency, a manufacturing company, or a retail business, the fundamentals of effective remote leadership remain the same.
The future belongs to leaders who can build trust without proximity, create clarity without control, and enable performance without presence. The tools will change. The platforms will evolve. But these principles will remain.
Because in the end, great remote leadership isn't about managing the distance between people—it's about closing the gap between potential and performance, regardless of where that potential sits.
– Scott