The Fundraising Choice That Changes Everything
dailyblog.scottdclary.com
Hi All,
Here’s my daily newsletter navigating the crossroads of business, growth, and life.
If you love this content (please share it), but also…
Start here > https://newsletter.scottdclary.com
Check out my Podcast, connect with me on YouTube / Twitter, and read my Weekly newsletter.
Sponsor: Lingoda
Look, I'll be real with you, my French used to be solid. I learned it in school. But when I booked a trip to France a few years ago, it was a total blank. I could barely order a croissant.
So I joined the Lingoda Sprint Challenge. And it changed everything. Live classes, five students max, real teachers. In two months, I went from bonjour to café conversations.
Here's how it works - you take 30 or 60 classes in 60 days, and when you finish, you get 50% of your money back. That works out to about $4.50 per class, which is honestly amazing for live instruction. Let's get fluent.
Listen Here
The Fundraising Choice That Changes Everything
You need money to grow your business.
You have two options: sell pieces of your company or borrow against its future.
Most founders think all money is the same. It's not.
The choice between equity and debt will determine whether you optimize for growth or control, quick scale or long-term ownership, external validation or internal freedom.
Equity means selling ownership to investors who become your partners. Debt means borrowing money from lenders who become your creditors.
Both can fuel growth. Both have trade-offs. Both lead to completely different outcomes.
Here's what nobody explains clearly: The type of money you take shapes the type of business you build.
Most founders make this choice without understanding what they're really choosing between.
What Equity Actually Means
When you raise equity, you're not just getting cash. You're getting partners.
Equity investors buy ownership in your company. They get a percentage of everything - profits, decision-making power, and control over major strategic choices.
This partnership comes with benefits most founders underestimate:
Strategic guidance from people who've built companies before
Connections to customers, talent, and additional funding
Credibility that opens doors with enterprise clients and top-tier employees
Shared risk - if the company struggles, investors lose money too
But it also comes with obligations most founders don't expect:
Board seats and voting rights on major decisions
Regular reporting and investor updates
Pressure to grow fast enough to generate returns for their fund
Potential loss of control if performance doesn't meet expectations
I know a founder who raised $3 million for 25% of his company. The investors brought him three major enterprise clients worth $2 million annually and helped him recruit a world-class CTO.
But they also pushed him to expand internationally before he was ready, vetoed his acquisition strategy, and ultimately replaced him as CEO when growth slowed.
"The money was amazing," he reflected. "But I didn't realize I was getting new bosses, not just new bank balances."
This reveals the fundamental nature of equity: You're not borrowing money, you're selling decision-making power.
What Debt Actually Means
Debt is simpler but has different constraints.
When you borrow money, you owe the lender principal plus interest. That's it. They get no ownership, no control, no say in your strategy.
You make monthly payments regardless of whether your business is thriving or struggling. Hit your payment schedule, and the money is yours to use however you want.
This comes with benefits many founders overlook:
Complete decision-making authority - no board meetings or investor approvals
Unlimited timeline - you can take years to find product-market fit if needed
All the upside - every dollar of profit and every dollar of valuation increase is yours
Predictable costs - you know exactly what you owe and when
But debt also creates constraints that equity doesn't:
Fixed payment obligations regardless of revenue fluctuations
Personal guarantees often required for business loans
Collateral requirements that put assets at risk
Limited access to strategic guidance and connections
A friend of mine bootstrapped her software company using business credit lines and asset-based lending. She maintained 100% ownership and built a business generating $2 million annually.
When COVID hit and enterprise budgets froze, her revenue dropped 60% overnight. Her loan payments didn't.
She had to lay off half her team and work without salary for eight months to keep up with payments. The business survived and is now stronger than ever, but it was touch-and-go.
"I kept thinking how nice it would have been to have investors who shared the pain instead of a bank that just wanted their money," she said.
This reveals the fundamental nature of debt: You keep control but accept all the risk.
The Growth Equation That Changes Everything
The equity vs debt choice comes down to how you want to grow and how fast you need to get there.
Equity-funded companies optimize for speed and scale.
Investors need big returns in 5-7 years, which creates pressure to grow as fast as possible. This works well for:
Markets where winner-takes-all dynamics reward the first to scale
Businesses that require massive upfront investment before generating revenue
Industries where network effects create exponential value
Airbnb needed equity because they had to achieve critical mass of hosts and guests simultaneously. The marketplace only worked at scale, and reaching scale required burning cash for years before becoming profitable.
Debt-funded companies optimize for sustainability and cash flow.
Lenders need regular payments, which creates pressure to generate positive cash flow quickly. This works well for:
Businesses with predictable revenue streams
Service companies that generate cash from day one
Physical products with proven demand
Mailchimp chose debt and bootstrapping over equity for 20 years. They grew more slowly but maintained 100% ownership of a business they eventually sold for $12 billion.
Neither approach is inherently better. They're optimized for different outcomes.
The question isn't which is right or wrong. It's which aligns with what you're trying to build.
The Three Questions That Determine Your Path
Before choosing between equity and debt, answer these three questions honestly:
Question 1: What are you optimizing for?
If you want to build the biggest possible company and are willing to give up control for speed, equity makes sense.
If you want to maintain complete control and build wealth through ownership, debt or bootstrapping makes sense.
Question 2: How predictable is your business?
If you have steady, recurring revenue you can count on, debt becomes much safer. You can accurately predict your ability to make payments.
If your revenue is uncertain, seasonal, or still being proven, equity investors who understand startup dynamics might be more appropriate.
Question 3: What does your market reward?
If your market has strong network effects or winner-take-all dynamics, speed might be more valuable than ownership. Equity can help you move faster.
If your market rewards quality, relationships, or gradual expansion, maintaining control and growing sustainably might create more value long-term.
The Timing Factor That Multiplies Everything
When you raise money matters as much as how you raise it.
The best deals happen when you don't desperately need the money.
When you're three months from running out of cash, you'll accept almost any terms offered. When you have 18 months of runway and strong metrics, you can be selective.
This applies to both equity and debt. VCs offer better valuations and terms to companies that don't need their money immediately. Banks provide better rates to businesses with strong cash flow and multiple options.
The paradox of fundraising: You get the best deals when you need them least.
The Choice That Defines Your Journey
The smartest founders ask one question before making any financing decision:
"What does this choice look like in 10 years?"
If you take equity investment, where will your ownership percentage be after future rounds? What control will you retain? What will your stake be worth if you hit your goals?
If you take debt, will those payments constrain your growth options? Will you be able to handle the obligations through market cycles? What opportunities might you miss because of reduced flexibility?
Steve Jobs took equity investment early in Apple's history. He gave up control and was eventually fired from his own company. But that same equity investment enabled Apple to become one of the most valuable companies in history, making Jobs incredibly wealthy when he returned.
Had he bootstrapped Apple, he would have maintained control but the company likely wouldn't have achieved the scale that created generational wealth.
There's no universal right answer. There are only answers that align with your specific vision and circumstances.
The equity vs debt decision shapes everything that follows: your daily experience as a founder, your relationship with growth, your definition of success, and your ultimate financial outcome.
Equity says: "I'm willing to share ownership and control to maximize growth and outcome."
Debt says: "I'm willing to accept payment obligations and personal risk to maintain ownership and control."
Both paths can lead to extraordinary success. Both can lead to failure. The difference is in understanding which trade-offs align with your goals and circumstances.
Choose based on the future you want to create, not just the cash you need today.
The money is just the beginning. The structure determines everything that comes next.
Thank you for reading.
– Scott