Hi All,
Here’s my daily newsletter navigating the crossroads of business, growth, and life.
If you love this content (please share it), but also…
Start here > https://newsletter.scottdclary.com
Check out my Podcast, connect with me on YouTube / Twitter, and read my Weekly newsletter.
Sponsor: Lingoda
Look, I'll be real with you, my French used to be solid. I learned it in school. But when I booked a trip to France a few years ago, it was a total blank. I could barely order a croissant.
So I joined the Lingoda Sprint Challenge. And it changed everything. Live classes, five students max, real teachers. In two months, I went from bonjour to café conversations.
Here's how it works - you take 30 or 60 classes in 60 days, and when you finish, you get 50% of your money back. That works out to about $4.50 per class, which is honestly amazing for live instruction.
Go to try.lingoda.com/success_sprint, use code SCOTT.SPRINT for extra €20 off.
Listen Here:
The "Nobody Cares About Your Brand" Law
You've spent months perfecting your logo. Weeks agonizing over your mission statement. Days debating the exact shade of blue for your website.
And nobody cares.
Not your customers. Not your investors. Not even your mom (though she'll politely pretend to).
This isn't me being cruel. This is me saving you from the most expensive delusion in business—the belief that people care about your brand for its own sake.
They don't.
They care about what your brand can do for them.
Most founders are building monuments to their own egos instead of solutions to customer problems. They obsess over brand identity while ignoring the only identity that matters: the identity of the customer they're supposedly serving.
Let me show you why this mindset is killing your business, and how the most successful companies in the world have leveraged the "Nobody Cares" law to build billion-dollar empires—not by creating the most beautiful brand, but by solving the most pressing problems.
The Ego Trap Most Founders Fall Into
Here's a brutally honest assessment:
Your origin story? Irrelevant.
Your brand values? Meaningless.
Your clever name? Forgettable.
At least until you've solved a real problem for real people.
I've watched countless founders fall into the same trap. They spend their precious early capital on:
Brand strategy sessions
Logo design iterations
Mission/vision workshops
"Brand voice" documents
Elaborate website designs
Meanwhile, they've barely spoken to a single customer about the actual problem they're supposedly solving.
This isn't just misguided. It's backwards.
The hard truth is that your brand doesn't create value. Your brand captures the value you've already created by solving a problem.
Airbnb didn't succeed because of their cute logo. They succeeded because they solved a massive problem: affordable travel accommodations in expensive cities. The brand came later.
Stripe didn't capture the payment processing market with clever branding. They made it ridiculously easy for developers to implement payments—solving a problem that caused immense pain.
The pattern is clear: Solve first, brand second.
But the ego is powerful. It wants recognition. It wants admiration. It wants to see your clever name in lights before you've earned the right to be there.
And that's where businesses go to die.
The McDonald's Reality Check
Think about the most successful brands in the world. What do they have in common?
It's not their logos or their color schemes. It's that they solve problems so effectively that they've become unavoidable.
Take McDonald's. Their branding is... fine. Nothing special. A yellow "M" isn't exactly revolutionary design.
But McDonald's solves real problems:
"I'm hungry right now"
"I need food that's consistent no matter where I am"
"I need to feed my kids something they'll actually eat without a fight"
"I need something affordable that fills me up"
That's it. McDonald's isn't winning design awards, but they're solving basic human needs consistently. Their brand value comes from the problems they solve, not the logo that represents them.
Ray Kroc, who built McDonald's into a global powerhouse, understood this deeply. He wasn't obsessed with branding—he was obsessed with operational excellence that delivered a consistent solution to hunger, quickly and affordably.
The solution created the brand, not the other way around.
What Your Customers Actually Care About
Let's get specific about what customers actually care about. Because once you understand this, your entire approach to business will change.
Customers care about:
Their problems – Not your solutions. Not yet.
Their time – How quickly can you solve their problem?
Their money – Is your solution worth what you're charging?
Their status – How does using your solution make them appear to others?
Their effort – How much work do they have to do to use your solution?
Notice what's missing? Your brand story. Your values. Your mission. Your fancy office. Your team culture.
These things might matter to you, but to the customer? They're background noise until you've solved their problem so effectively that they have attention left over to care about who you are.
Jeff Bezos built Amazon with a maniacal focus on customer problems. "Start with the customer and work backwards," he famously said. Not "start with our brand identity and push it on customers."
When Amazon launched, their website was ugly. Their logo was basic. Their brand was nothing special. But they solved a real problem better than anyone else: getting books delivered quickly without having to go to a store.
The brand followed the solution, not the other way around.
The Three Questions That Matter More Than Your Brand
Instead of asking "Does our brand reflect our values?" ask these three questions:
What specific problem are we solving? (If your answer is vague, you're already failing)
How painful is this problem for our customers? (If it's a mild annoyance rather than a hair-on-fire problem, you're in trouble)
How much better is our solution than the current alternatives? (Slightly better isn't enough—you need to be 10x better in at least one important dimension)
These questions force you to focus on what actually matters: the value you create, not how you present that value.
When Dropbox launched, founder Drew Houston didn't spend months perfecting the brand. He created a simple 3-minute video demonstrating the product solving a real problem. That was it. The video went viral because it showed a solution to a painful problem, not because it had great branding.
The most successful businesses I know have clarity on these three questions before they ever worry about their logo or their "brand voice."
How to Shift from Brand-Obsessed to Problem-Obsessed
If you've been caught in the brand obsession trap, here's how to escape it:
1. Talk to 10 customers this week
Not about your brand. Not about your features. About their problems.
Ask them:
"What's the hardest part about X?"
"How are you solving this problem today?"
"What would an ideal solution look like?"
Then shut up and listen. Take notes. Look for patterns.
2. Identify the hair-on-fire problem
Not all problems are created equal. Some are mild annoyances. Others are five-alarm fires that demand immediate attention.
Your business will grow fastest when you're extinguishing fires, not addressing minor irritations.
Patrick McKenzie (Patio11) built multiple successful businesses by focusing relentlessly on hair-on-fire problems. He didn't care about having the prettiest brand. He cared about solving problems so painful that customers would pay immediately for relief.
3. Build the minimum solution that works
What's the simplest way to solve the core problem you've identified?
Not the most comprehensive solution. Not the most elegant. The solution that addresses the core pain with the least complexity.
This is what the "minimum viable product" concept was supposed to be about before it was corrupted into "the minimum we can get away with shipping."
4. Let your customers write your brand story
Here's a radical idea: instead of telling customers who you are, let them tell you who you are based on the problems you solve for them.
The most authentic brand stories aren't crafted in marketing meetings. They emerge from the real experiences customers have with your product.
Zappos didn't start with a brand story about delivering happiness. That emerged after they solved a real problem: getting shoes delivered quickly with free returns. The brand followed the solution.
The First Contrarian View: When Branding Does Matter
Now, there's a counterargument here worth addressing. In certain markets, particularly luxury goods or status-signaling products, the brand itself can become part of the solution to a status problem.
Apple. Supreme. Louis Vuitton.
For these brands, the logo itself helps solve the customer's problem of "How do I signal my taste/wealth/membership in a certain tribe?"
But even here, the brand only works because it's attached to a product that solved a real problem first:
Apple made technology beautiful and simple when everything else was ugly and complicated
Supreme created artificial scarcity in a world of abundance
Louis Vuitton crafted exceptional quality when most goods were becoming disposable
The brand amplified an existing solution; it didn't create value on its own.
And unless you're explicitly in the status-signaling business, this exception doesn't apply to you.
The Second Contrarian View: Brand as Insurance
Here's another perspective that challenges my "Nobody Cares About Your Brand" law: Brand as insurance against uncertainty.
In some markets, especially where the consequence of failure is high, a strong brand serves as risk mitigation. This is why enterprise software still sells despite having inferior products to newer startups.
As the old saying goes: "Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM."
The CIO who chooses Microsoft over a superior but unknown solution is making a rational choice. If the superior solution fails, they take the blame. If Microsoft fails, the system takes the blame.
There's an entire category of purchase decisions where brand becomes a proxy for reliability, stability, and safety. This is especially true in:
Medical devices
Baby products
Enterprise software
Financial services
Safety equipment
In these categories, the brand isn't solving the core functional problem. It's solving the emotional problem of uncertainty and fear of making the wrong choice.
But here's the catch: Even in these markets, the brand only gained its power through years of consistently solving the core problem reliably. Johnson & Johnson didn't become trusted for baby products through clever marketing alone—they earned trust by making products that were consistently safe.
The brand became valuable only after the solution proved itself.
So while this perspective offers some nuance to our "Nobody Cares" law, it actually reinforces the fundamental point: Focus first on solving the problem consistently and reliably. The brand value will follow.
This approach requires patience—something in short supply for most founders. But it's how the most valuable brands in the world were built.
The Cost of Ignoring This Law
The "Nobody Cares About Your Brand" law isn't just good advice—ignoring it can be fatal to your business.
When you focus on brand before solution:
You waste precious startup capital on things that don't drive customer acquisition
You optimize for looking good rather than being good
You attract employees who care more about status than solving problems
Worst of all, you get addicted to vanity metrics and press mentions rather than customer outcomes
I've watched companies burn through millions in venture capital building a brand before proving they can solve a problem worth paying for.
They hire expensive branding agencies. They launch with elaborate PR campaigns. They get their 15 minutes of fame.
Then they die—quietly, painfully—when they realize too late that nobody actually needed what they built.
The market is ruthlessly efficient at detecting the difference between brands built on solving problems and brands built on ego.
The Tesla Paradox: A Deeper Story
In 2006, Elon Musk published the "Tesla Master Plan." It was laughably simple:
Build a sports car
Use that money to build an affordable car
Use that money to build an even more affordable car
While doing above, also provide zero emission electric power generation options
That's it. No fancy brand manifestos. No elaborate storytelling. Just a clear-eyed focus on solving escalating problems.
What's fascinating about Tesla's early days is what they didn't do. They didn't hire expensive branding agencies. They didn't spend millions on advertising. They didn't agonize over the perfect logo or brand voice.
Instead, they tackled the fundamental problem with electric cars: they were ugly, slow, and impractical.
When the original Tesla Roadster launched, the website was basic. The logo was nothing special. The company headquarters was a small office in San Carlos, California.
But the car? It went from 0 to 60 in 3.7 seconds. It looked like a luxury sports car. It could travel 245 miles on a single charge when competitors could barely manage 100 miles.
The car solved the problem of electric vehicles being perceived as glorified golf carts.
That's the essence of the "Nobody Cares About Your Brand" law. Early Tesla customers didn't care about the Tesla brand—the brand had no heritage, no history, no meaning. They cared about driving an electric car that was actually better than gas alternatives.
The powerful Tesla brand we know today emerged organically from their relentless focus on solving the electric vehicle problem, not from brand strategy sessions.
The brand became a reflection of the solution, not the other way around.
How Stripe Got It Right
Let's look at how one of the most valuable companies in fintech approached this challenge.
When Patrick and John Collison founded Stripe, they didn't start with branding exercises. They started by solving an excruciating problem for developers: implementing payments sucked.
Their first product was embarrassingly simple. Their website was basic. Their documentation was minimal but clear.
But they solved the core problem so well that developers instantly recognized the value. Seven lines of code to implement payments instead of weeks of integration work? That's not a brand. That's a painkiller.
The Stripe brand we know today—the one widely admired for its clean design, excellent documentation, and developer-friendly ethos—emerged organically from their relentless focus on solving developer problems.
The brand became a reflection of the solution, not the other way around.
Your Next Steps: Problem-First Business Building
If you're just starting out, here's your action plan:
Today:
Delete any branding tasks from your to-do list
Schedule 5 customer conversations for this week
Write down the specific problem you're solving in one clear sentence
This week:
Identify the current solutions people use for this problem
Determine if your solution is genuinely 10x better in some important dimension
Build the simplest possible version of your solution
This month:
Get your solution into the hands of 10 paying customers
Collect their unfiltered feedback
Iterate based on what they actually value, not what you think they should value
This approach won't get you immediate press coverage. It won't give you a beautiful brand to show off to friends. It won't stroke your ego.
But it will give you something far more valuable: a business that solves real problems and creates real value.
And ironically, that's exactly how the most valuable brands in the world were built.
The brutal truth remains: Nobody cares about your brand. They care about what your brand does for them.
So stop worrying about how you look, and start obsessing over the problems you solve.
That's how you build a business that lasts.
Thank you for reading.
– Scott
Absolutely agree with your core principle here, Scott—businesses must solve real problems first. Period.
But I’d offer a caution: your piece, while powerfully argued, risks becoming dangerously selective in its examples—and that selectivity can mislead founders into skipping crucial steps.
Yes, brand workshops, vision boards, and carefully shaded logos before you’ve solved a real problem are a vanity trap. No argument there.
But on the other end of the spectrum? I’ve seen far too many founders crash and burn precisely because all they did was start with a problem. They built a technically sound solution, launched it... and no one cared. Why? Because humans aren’t utilitarian automatons. If we were, we’d all shop at the same store, eat the same protein bars, and wear the same grey sweatpants.
People buy into more than a solution—they buy into meaning, identity, emotion, and difference. And that’s where brand (yes, even early brand thinking) comes in—not as decoration, but as a bridge between the problem you solve and the people you’re solving it for.
Tesla didn’t just succeed because it solved the EV problem. It succeeded because its mission, values, and founder mythology were already aligned—even if they weren’t printed on a mission statement. So yes, they "skipped" the brand-building… because they didn’t need to do it on paper. It was already embedded. But fast forward to today, and Tesla's brutal sales drop—despite still solving the EV problem—proves that violating the "soft brand" elements like trust, values, and public alignment does have a cost, even in a problem-first business.
So I’d offer this:
👉 Start with a problem.
👉 But don’t pretend that’s enough. Humans still need to care. And caring isn’t always rational.