Why Smart People Fail in Business
dailyblog.scottdclary.com
Hi All,
Here’s my daily newsletter navigating the crossroads of business, growth, and life.
If you love this content (please share it), but also…
Start here > https://newsletter.scottdclary.com
Check out my Podcast, connect with me on YouTube / Twitter, and read my Weekly newsletter.
Sponsor: FreshBooks
The numbers speak for themselves - over 30 million people have chosen FreshBooks, processing more than $60 billion in invoices and saving an incredible 192 hours annually on accounting tasks. As an all-in-one accounting solution, FreshBooks helps entrepreneurs and freelancers create professional estimates, track time, automatically bill clients, and capture expenses on the go - all while integrating seamlessly with over 100 business tools and providing award-winning customer service.
Ready to stop drowning in receipts and chasing payments? Start your 30-day free trial at freshbooks.com - no credit card required.
Transform Your Business with FreshBooks
Listen Here:
Why Smart People Fail in Business
I once watched a Harvard MBA with a perfect SAT score pitch his startup to investors.
His business plan was impeccable. His market analysis was comprehensive. His financial projections were detailed down to the penny. The room was impressed with his intellect.
He didn't get a dollar.
Across town that same week, a college dropout with average grades secured $2 million for an idea scribbled on the back of a napkin.
This wasn't a fluke. I've seen this pattern repeat hundreds of times over the past decade.
The more intelligent you are, the more likely you are to overanalyze and hesitate while someone "dumber" just executes.
Intelligence, it turns out, is often the enemy of success.
The Paralysis of Analysis
Most business failures don't come from stupidity.
They come from smart people who think themselves into corners.
Your overthinking brain is costing you millions, and you don't even realize it.
Every day, I watch brilliant founders, executives, and creators fall into the same trap:
They research endlessly instead of launching.
They perfect instead of ship.
They plan instead of act.
They think instead of do.
This isn't an occasional problem—it's an epidemic among the highly intelligent.
Look at Kodak. They actually invented the digital camera in 1975. Their engineer Steve Sasson created the first prototype, but management couldn't see beyond their film business. One executive reportedly said, "That's cute, but don't tell anyone about it" because they feared how it might affect their film market.
Kodak didn't fail because they lacked intelligence. Their teams had PhDs and brilliant minds. They failed because their intelligence became a liability when it created attachment to existing knowledge and resistance to change.
Smart people often can't see past what they already know.
And that blindness costs them everything.
The Blockbuster Syndrome
Perhaps the most famous case of overthinking leading to business failure is Blockbuster.
In 2000, Netflix founder Reed Hastings proposed a partnership to Blockbuster CEO John Antioco. Netflix would run Blockbuster's online brand, and Blockbuster would promote Netflix in its stores.
Blockbuster's executive team, full of MBAs and industry veterans, analyzed the proposal and rejected it because they thought Netflix was a "niche business." They couldn't see beyond their successful retail model.
Ten years later, Blockbuster filed for bankruptcy, and Netflix became a $28 billion company.
What's fascinating isn't that Blockbuster made a bad decision. It's HOW they made that bad decision.
They applied sophisticated analysis to a future they couldn't possibly predict. They used their intelligence to justify staying in their comfort zone rather than taking a calculated risk.
Meanwhile, Netflix was making decisions with incomplete information but taking action that generated real-world feedback.
Analysis creates the illusion of progress. Action creates actual progress.
The Two Modes of Thinking
We operate in two distinct cognitive modes:
Thinking Mode: Analyzing, planning, theorizing
Doing Mode: Testing, iterating, getting feedback
Most smart people vastly overvalue the first and undervalue the second.
When facing uncertainty, the average mind says, "Let's try something and see what happens."
The intelligent mind says, "Let's think about all possible outcomes before we act."
This sounds reasonable until you realize that in complex environments:
Most variables are unknown
Most predictions are wrong
Most plans don't survive contact with reality
The doing mode generates data. The thinking mode only generates theories.
And in business, data beats theories every time.
The Psychology Behind the Problem
Your intelligent brain is playing a cruel trick on you.
When you're smart, thinking feels productive. Analysis seems like progress. Research feels like work.
But it's often just sophisticated procrastination.
I've fallen into this trap myself. Before launching my podcast, I spent three months creating the perfect strategy. I analyzed competitors, developed proprietary methodologies, and crafted the perfect positioning.
None of it mattered.
What created actual momentum was a pressing record and iterating through my failures.
The most dangerous form of business procrastination isn't watching Netflix or scrolling social media. It's doing work that feels productive but doesn't move you closer to results.
Smart people often mistake motion for action.
The Fear Factor
At its core, overthinking isn't an intellectual problem. It's an emotional one.
Intelligent people are used to being right. Their identities are often built around being the smartest person in the room. This creates two massive psychological barriers:
Fear of Failure: When your self-worth is tied to your intelligence, being wrong feels devastating.
Fear of Judgment: Smart people worry that others will judge their work as mediocre, which feels worse than not producing work at all.
These fears trigger analysis paralysis – the endless search for more information to prevent a mistake that might threaten your identity as "the smart one."
Research from psychology professor Susan Nolen-Hoeksema found that chronic overthinkers not only generate poor solutions to their problems, but they also feel unable to implement any solutions at all.
Simply knowing you overthink doesn't solve the problem. The emotional roots run deeper than your conscious awareness.
The Three Types of Overthinking
Not all overthinking is created equal. Understanding which type you suffer from is crucial to overcoming it:
1. Perfectionist Overthinking
This happens when you refuse to ship anything until it's flawless.
The perfectionist mindset says, "If it's not perfect, it's a failure."
But in business, done is better than perfect. Every improvement after 80% completion yields diminishing returns.
Reed Hastings of Netflix took the opposite approach when making the difficult transition from DVDs to streaming. He said, "We were so obsessed with not being the next Kodak, the next AOL, about not being the company that clung to its roots and missed the big thing... we have to be so aggressive it makes our skin crawl."
Hastings wasn't paralyzed by the need for a perfect transition plan. He knew that acting boldly, even with some missteps, was better than perfect planning that came too late.
2. Risk-Assessment Overthinking
This occurs when you envision all possible failure scenarios and give them equal weight.
The risk-assessment mindset says, "I need to address every potential problem before moving forward."
But not all risks are created equal. Most of what we worry about never happens, and the real challenges are often ones we didn't anticipate.
All that analysis was wasted energy that could have gone into building, launching, and responding to real feedback.
3. Options Overthinking
This happens when you have too many choices and can't decide between them.
The options mindset says, "I need to consider every alternative to find the optimal path."
But in fast-moving markets, the cost of delay often exceeds the benefit of finding the perfect option.
In business, decisive action with 70% confidence usually beats perfect analysis.
Historical Lessons: Columbus's Miscalculation
This pattern isn't new. Throughout history, the gap between knowledge and action has determined success more than raw intelligence.
In the late 1400s, most educated Europeans knew the world was round. They had calculated its circumference with reasonable accuracy and understood that sailing west to reach Asia was theoretically possible.
But it was Christopher Columbus—whose calculations were actually wrong—who took action.
Columbus drastically underestimated the Earth's size. Had he known the true distance to Asia, he might never have set sail. His geographical ignorance became his greatest asset.
While more knowledgeable minds deemed the journey impossible with available ships and supplies (they were right), Columbus's miscalculations gave him the confidence to act.
The history of innovation is filled with such examples—people who knew just enough to act, but not so much that they talked themselves out of trying.
The "smart" people who calculate and deliberate often end up working for the "foolish" ones who dare and do.
The MBA Liability
I've worked with dozens of MBA graduates from elite institutions.
Their analytical frameworks are impeccable. Their understanding of business theory is comprehensive. Their financial models are sophisticated.
Yet time and again, I've seen them outperformed by founders with no formal business education.
Why? Because business schools teach you to analyze problems from every angle. They reward comprehensive understanding. They value sophisticated approaches.
The real world rewards speed and action, not perfect analysis.
Last year, I advised two competing fintech startups. The first was led by former McKinsey consultants with Harvard MBAs. They took 90 days to analyze the market before making their first move.
The second was led by industry veterans with no formal business training. They entered the market in 45 days, signed three major clients, and used real feedback to refine their approach.
By the time the McKinsey team finished their analysis, they were already playing catch-up.
Sophisticated business education can become a liability when it makes you believe the map is the territory.
No strategy survives first contact with the market. The sooner you make that contact, the sooner you can adapt.
The Five Mental Shifts of Successful Smart People
The most successful intelligent people I know have made five crucial mental shifts:
1. From Certainty to Experimentation
Instead of trying to be right the first time, they see business as a series of experiments that generate data.
They ask: "What's the smallest test I can run to learn something useful?"
2. From Perfection to Iteration
Rather than waiting until something is perfect, they release early versions and improve based on feedback.
They embrace the mantra: "If you're not embarrassed by your first version, you waited too long to launch."
3. From Planning to Acting
Instead of creating comprehensive plans, they make just enough plans to take the next step.
They know that detailed five-year plans are fantasy documents in rapidly changing environments.
4. From Knowledge to Wisdom
Rather than accumulating more information, they focus on implementing what they already know.
They recognize that most businesses don't fail from lack of knowledge—they fail from lack of execution.
5. From Fear to Acceptance
Instead of trying to avoid all mistakes, they accept that errors are inevitable and focus on recovering quickly.
They ask: "What's the worst that could happen, and could I handle it?" Usually, the answer is yes.
Breaking Free: The Action Protocol
If you recognize yourself in this letter, here's a practical system to escape the overthinking trap:
1. Set Decision Deadlines
For every business decision, establish a concrete deadline:
Small decisions: 1 hour
Medium decisions: 1 day
Large decisions: 1 week
Critical decisions: 1 month
When the deadline arrives, you must act with whatever information you have. This prevents the never-ending quest for more data.
2. Establish the 70% Rule
If you have 70% of the information needed, and your solution seems 70% right, and you're 70% confident—act.
Don't wait for 100%. The remaining 30% usually costs more in delay than it's worth.
3. Create Forcing Functions
A forcing function is a self-imposed constraint that makes action inevitable:
Announce your launch date publicly
Book a venue for a product demonstration
Schedule meetings with clients about work you haven't completed yet
Pay for services you'll need when the project is further along
These create productive pressure that overcomes analysis paralysis.
4. Focus on Reversible Decisions
Jeff Bezos distinguishes between Type 1 decisions (nearly irreversible) and Type 2 decisions (easily reversible).
Most business decisions are Type 2, but smart people often treat them like Type 1.
Ask yourself: "Could we easily undo this if it doesn't work?" If yes, decide quickly and move on.
5. Implement Minimum Viable Thinking
For any project, define the minimum thinking required to take action, then stop when you reach that threshold.
This isn't about being reckless. It's about recognizing the diminishing returns of additional analysis.
The Choice Is Yours
Your intelligence should be your greatest asset, not your biggest liability.
The solution isn't to become less intelligent. It's to channel your intelligence toward action rather than analysis.
Use your brainpower to:
Design small, information-rich experiments
Create rapid learning cycles
Develop elegant recovery strategies
Analyze real feedback, not hypotheticals
Today, identify one project where you've been stuck in analysis:
What's the smallest action you could take to generate real feedback?
What arbitrary deadline could you set to force a decision?
What public commitment would create urgency?
Then do it.
The greatest business tragedy isn't failure. It's the brilliant idea you never gave a chance to succeed.
Business is full of smart people who thought too much and did too little. Don't be one of them.
Thank you for reading.
– Scott